Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Wouldn't it be great if all states had the death penalty - for death penalty supporters?

Posted 11 years ago on May 24, 2012, 10:01 p.m. EST by bensdad (8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

One of the strongest arguments against the death penalty is the frightening chance of executing an innocent person. Columbia University law professor James Liebman said he and a team of students have proven that Texas gave a lethal injection to the wrong man.

Carlos DeLuna was executed in 1989 for stabbing to death a gas station clerk in Corpus Christi six years earlier. It was a ghastly crime. The trial attracted local attention, but not from concern that a guiltless man would be punished while the killer went free.

DeLuna, an eighth grade dropout, maintained that he was innocent from the moment cops put him in the back seat of a patrol car until the day he died. Today, 29 years after DeLuna was arrested, Liebman and his team published a mammoth report in the Human Rights Law Review that concludes DeLuna paid with his life for a crime he likely did not commit. Shoddy police work, the prosecution's failure to pursue another suspect, and a weak defense combined to send DeLuna to death row, they argued.

"I would say that across the board, there was nonchalance," Liebman told The Huffington Post. "It looked like a common case, but we found that there was a very serious claim of innocence."

Police and prosecutors treated the killing of Wanda Lopez at the Sigmor Shamrock gas station on February 4, 1983, like a robbery gone bad. A recording of the chilling 911 call from Lopez, a 24-year-old single mom working the night shift, captured her screaming and begging her killer for mercy.

DeLuna, then 20, was found hiding under a pickup truck a few blocks from the gory crime scene. A wad of rolled-up bills totaling $149 was in his pocket.

Eyewitness testimony formed the bedrock of the case against him. Now, that testimony is perhaps most contested aspect of his conviction.

Cops brought DeLuna back to the Shamrock. A customer filling his tank before the murder told police that DeLuna was the man he saw putting a knife in his pocket outside the store. Another customer who rushed to the store's entrance when he heard Lopez struggling identified DeLuna as the man who emerged. A married couple saw a man running a few blocks away and later identified DeLuna in police photos shown to them.

With DeLuna's record of numerous arrests for burglary and public drunkenness, plus a conviction for attempted rape and auto theft, it seemed like police had found the perp. But Liebman said DeLuna took the fall in a case of mistaken identity.

Among the key findings in the Columbia team's report:

The eyewitness statements actually conflict with each other. What witnesses said about the appearance and location of the suspect suggest that they were describing more than one person.

Photos of a bloody footprint and blood spatter on the walls suggest the killer would have had blood on his shoes and pant legs, yet DeLuna's clothes were clean.

Prosecutors and police ignored tips unearthed in the case files that Carlos Hernandez, an older friend of DeLuna, who had a reputation for wielding a blade, had killed Lopez. The defense failed to track down Hernandez, who bore a striking resemblance to DeLuna.

"If a new trial was somehow able to be conducted today, a jury would acquit DeLuna" said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, who read a draft of Liebman's report. "We don't have a perfect case where can agree that we have an innocent person who's been executed, but by weight of this investigation, I think we can say this is as close as a person is going to come."

6 Comments

6 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by vikramdas (4) from Bronx, NY 11 years ago

it is very tough Death Penalty, who read a draft of Liebman's report.

http://www.amirafoods.com/

[Removed]

[+] -4 points by tupacsugar (-136) 11 years ago

You were wrong about Trayvon so why should anybody listen to a flawed over-reactionary like you? Your judgement is in question,you've lost all cred and you're an Obama booster not a real OWS supporter.

[-] 3 points by bensdad (8977) 11 years ago

Dare you POST -
cut & paste from my post exactly what I proclaimed as RIGHT
that is WRONG

[-] -3 points by tupacsugar (-136) 11 years ago

Why should I waste my time proving to you what everybody now knows? Trayvon was a punk that was trying to kill Zimmerman and George did what any sane person would do.....defend his life and unfortunately Trayvon came up on the losing end of that deal. But you,being the over-reactionary progressive activist jumped on the Sharpton-Jackson race baiting train and rode it till it finally derailed.

You have no cred,siding with Jackson and Sharpton is stupid enough but trying and convicting Zimmerman before all the facts were in,that just shows a complete lack of common sense and good judgement. So does voting for Obama,....man,you aren't too fucking smart are you?

[-] 4 points by bensdad (8977) 11 years ago

Vulgarity is a precursor to dementia -
see your doctors
ask them to loosen your straight jacket

[-] 0 points by tupacsugar (-136) 11 years ago

"Vulgarity is a precursor to dementia"

You must be speaking from experience,dementia would explain a lot of your posts and replies.