Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Why Government Becomes the Scapegoat

Posted 11 years ago on June 25, 2012, 12:57 p.m. EST by JadedCitizen (4277)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Conservatives and business like to blame government for most of the problems in society. They must scapegoat government in order to distract public attention from the real causes of many of our social and economic problems.

Why Conservatives Must Scapegoat Government

Ordinary Americans are facing an ever increasing number of financial and economic difficulties: their wages have stagnated, many people have little money for retirement, jobs have been downsized and outsourced, rising costs have put college out of reach for many, the gap between rich and poor has increased, health care costs have continued to rise for millions, and so on. And all of this was before the recent deep recession. The American dream just isn’t what it used to be; and faced with these mounting difficulties and risks, many Americans are anxious and angry. And they are looking for someone to take it out on. But the problem for conservatives is this: the causes of virtually all of the serious problems just mentioned are located in the private sector. The workings of the free market and the decisions of business leaders are largely responsible for low wages, high medical costs, increasing economic inequality, stock market crashes, and so on. These are some of the downsides of a modern capitalist market economy. But of course conservatives cannot admit this. They must find a scapegoat on which to deflect this public anger – and government is the perfect one.

Increasingly, most anti-government activists have embraced a kind of “market fundamentalism.” They have a blind faith in the perfection of the market and a strong belief that if markets are left alone, they will solve most problems and produce the best of all possible worlds. So these people desperately need someone or something else they can blame for the economic problems being experienced by many Americans. They have to blame government, because the alternative – admitting to the imperfections of market capitalism – is unthinkable. That is why they are forced to try to blame virtually all of society’s problems on government – no matter how absurd and how unfounded most of these accusations actually are. This seemingly irrational display on the part of free-market conservatives actually begins to make more sense once we realize that they really have no choice. Once they are committed to believe in the perfection of the market, they must also then believe that the government is the source of our problems. So it is not just that they want to blame government for our problems; they have to blame government, no matter how ridiculous this might be in many cases.

A New Acceptable Form of Scapegoating

Scapegoating is certainly nothing new in American politics. It has been particularly common among extreme right-wing populist groups throughout our history. The Know Nothings of the 19th century heaped blame on Catholics and immigrants for society’s problems. In the twentieth century, the Ku Klux Klan pointed the finger at blacks and Jews. Today, instead of targeting and demonizing a particular religious or ethnic group, the target has often become politicians, bureaucrats, judges and the institutions of government itself.

This new target has a number of advantages for conservatives. First, it plays on traditional American distrust of government and politicians. Second, and more importantly, blaming the government seems to be a more sanitized and acceptable form of scapegoating. Those who do it cannot be charged with being racist or xenophobic. Most people today would not tolerate an effort to make racial or religious groups the scapegoats for society’s problems. But many are willing to stand by as the very same vicious tactic is used against government officials and politicians. This “sanitizing” of scapegoating has allowed it to become more widespread. This is the other thing that is new about this kind of political scapegoating – it has gone mainstream. This tactic is no longer limited to ultra right-wing kooks, but is now used by a major political party and by large numbers of average Americans. Targeting government has become the political witch-hunt that the whole family can enjoy.

Ultimately, however, the biggest problem with scapegoating government is that it makes it much harder to solve our pressing social and economic problems. Whipping up feelings of anger and resentment against the government only encourages irrational thinking and distracts us from understanding the real causes of our problems. As the hatred of government grows, it pushes out reason and common sense. People caught up in these powerful emotions rarely stop to think clearly about whether government is really to blame or to consider alternative causes of our problems.

Full article,,,, http://www.governmentisgood.com/articles.php?aid=22&p=1

50 Comments

50 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by HempTwister (667) from Little Rock, AR 11 years ago

Vote for people who think government is broken and let them show that it is. What kind of sense does that make?

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

About as much sense as sending an arson to put out a fire.

[-] 2 points by HempTwister (667) from Little Rock, AR 11 years ago

I am so stealing that!

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

You can have it for a twinkle.

[-] 2 points by vegasirius (10) from Sacramento, CA 11 years ago

The wealthy will use any propaganda to distract us from the fact that their selfishly greedy fallacious 'business' practices are the problem

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Conservatives would collar the blame on puppies and kittens if they thought they could get away with it.

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Toward Greater Economic Equality

The first line of attack is to go straight to the heart of the problem: our large inequalities in wealth and income. If these disparities are the basic cause of political inequalities, then these private inequalities need to be lessened if we want to move toward political system where power is more widely dispersed among all citizens. So we need to produce a fairer division of the economic pie that is created by the work of all Americans. However, such changes in the distribution of wealth and income will not come about naturally through the market, but can only be enacted through various kinds of public policies on the state and federal levels. Here are some policies that would help to reduce wage and wealth inequalities.

  • Raise State and Federal Minimum Wages. This policy would immediately benefit those at the bottom of the economic ladder. During the last several decades, minimum wage has been increasingly falling behind the average wage and it needs to be increased.
  • Living Wage Policies. Another approach to raising the incomes of the poor and working class is to pass local ordinances requiring that a “living wage” be paid by companies with government contracts or subsidies. The wage has usually been pegged to the amount that would lift a family of three or four above the poverty level. Cities like Baltimore and Los Angeles have passed living wage laws that have increased the wages of thousands of workers in those urban areas.
  • Earned Income Tax Credits. Many liberals and conservatives agree that the EITC has been very successful in subsidizing the wages of low-income working families so that they may stay out of poverty. This program must be maintained and hopefully expanded to cover even more low income workers.
  • Full-Employment Policies. If government policymakers were more serious about reducing unemployment to a minimum, this would reduce both poverty and wage inequality. Many people are poor for lack of a full-time job. And when the employment market is tight, this forces companies to raise wages in order to attract workers.
  • Reducing High Corporate Salaries. Decreasing economic inequality may involve not only increasing the incomes of those on the bottom, but also putting reasonable limits on the income of those on the top. The salaries of top corporate executives have been ballooning while average wages have stagnated. U.S. CEOs currently make salaries that are over 200 times that of the average worker – a much higher disparity than we see in most other Western countries.
  • Bolstering Union Power. Government policies to strengthen the power of unions would probably have the highest payoffs in the effort to reduce wage inequality. Many other Western countries have lower levels of economic inequality precisely because unions are more common and have more clout. Union bargaining clearly helps to increase the wages and benefits of low and moderate income workers. We could do much more to facilitate the establishment of unions and to increase their bargaining power. For example, instead of the current lengthy process needed to establish unions, we could require instant recognition of any union that signs up a majority of workers in a workplace. We could also institute a ban on the use of permanent replacement workers – a major tool used by management to break strikes. Canada has this ban and also requires instant recognition of unions – one reason their rate of unionization is three times that of the U.S. Another change that would help unions would be to remove the ban on secondary boycotts, where workers from one company are prohibited from supporting strikers in another company – say by refusing to cross a picket line. Finally, the Taft-Hartely Act should be repealed. This act impedes workers abilities to unionize and has legitimized a wide array of anti-union activities by employers.
  • Free or Low-Cost Higher Education. We should be increasing the number of government grants (not loans) for college students – or better yet, we should make higher education free for all Americans. After World War II, the G.I Bill enabled millions of people to get a debt-free college education, which gave a significant boost to their asset-building efforts. A similar effort now would help millions attend college and ensure that they graduate without a crushing load of debt.
  • Kidsave Accounts have been proposed that would guarantee every child $1,000 at birth and $500 per year to every child from ages one to five – all to be invested until retirement. This would significantly bolster Social Security and other retirement accounts for all Americans.
  • Progressive Taxation. More progressive tax rates would help to even the playing field. The rich should be paying more in income taxes. Estate taxes, which currently impact only the very richest families, should be maintained. Capital gains – which disproportionately go to the wealthy – should be taxed at the same rate as wages. Finally, a direct tax on wealth, from which most Americans would be exempt, would help to undermine huge concentrations of wealth. Many European countries already have such wealth taxes.
  • Employee Ownership Plans. Government policies should help to broaden employee ownership of businesses – the main generators of wealth in our country. Policies should encourage employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), profit-sharing plans, and widely granted stock options that would significantly increase the stake that workers have in private enterprises.

A more equitable distribution of income and wealth would certainly be a step in the right direction in the effort to remedy the unfair distribution of political power that we have in the U.S. The goal of these policies is not to eliminate economic inequality in America; no one is arguing that everyone should make the same amount of money. The point is to begin to reduce economic inequality to a more reasonable and just level – a level at which it will no longer undermine the promise of political equality.

[-] 2 points by HempTwister (667) from Little Rock, AR 11 years ago

I am going to guess that you have heard all the right wing talking points on these things.There is not an item on your list that could get out of either house of Congress right now. The problem is that they have a lot more "free speech" than we do. Unlikely that we will get an even playing field without the amendment. A high marginal tax rate solves many of those things. Nice thinking, btw.

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

An amendment and campaign reforms would be a necessary step to get from here to there. btw, credit to Prof. Douglas J. Amy for the above.

[-] 1 points by freewriterguy (882) 11 years ago

Government is the problem, go attend a small claims court proceedings and see how they align themselves with the rich! or how many bench warrants are issued against the poor who fell victim to the predatory lending practices of "check city", check into cash", or landlords who withold the homes from the poor because they got in early in the pyramid economics and paid as little as 8k for their homes, but continue to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars from the poor who will never own any of america even though their fathers fought to conquer this land!

It is foretold in the scriptures of Jeremiah, that the poor of this land would be ground in the dirt, and the great suffering that awaits these people after they had been blessed so much will be equally just!

I think it should be illegal to rent, that people who are paying for their basic necessity should own that piece of America! Why should our government tolerate oppression of our poor people anymore by favoring a pyramid type financial system, where only a few at the top get rich instead we should make it mandatory that no one can enjoy luxury until all people have their basic needs met.

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

You bring up a great point. Government is a problem because it infested by people who only hear the voices of the wealthy. But don't confuse the people in government with the institution of government itself. The key is to find a way to get the right people in government. Scapegoating government solves nothing. The truth is that government is the mechanism standing between us and the uber-wealthy. When is the last time you had a democratic workplace.

[-] 1 points by HempTwister (667) from Little Rock, AR 11 years ago

Laws and the justice system are to protect the rich from the poor.

When they protect the poor from the rich they call them regulations. ;p

[-] 1 points by brightonsage (4494) 11 years ago

The problem with this article is that it ignores the fact the government is full of GOP appointees who have "burrowed in" and been given civil service jobs. These people don't believe that government should solve problems so a) they focus their attention on other things, b) they actively sabotage the government to prove their point and c) since they believe that it is illegitimate, they feel free to steal from it and/or help others steal from it. This was particularly obvious in the Iraq War. The Defense Department is so screwed up, it hasn't produced a set of financial statements for decades. They complain about expensive hammers and toilet seats while $ billions walk out the door unaccounted for, for the reasons cited above.

They didn't believe in it, so they took long term jobs in it. And then they bad mouth it. No hypocrisy here!

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Hypocrites extraordinaire.

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 11 years ago

It's funny how conservatives blame government. When they're 50% of it. It takes a certain amount of self-loathing to be a conservative. Which is associated with sociopathy. Whoops! There's that sociopathy again! But in a sense they're right. They are the problem.

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

My score: 45 out of 100. This puts you in the category of the low Machs, people who will hold out for the goodness of the world and avoid manipulation. Not the people Machiavelli would approve of.

I think Machiavelli would approve of most high ranking conservatives.

http://personality-testing.info/tests/MACH-IV.php

[-] 1 points by SparkyJP (1646) from Westminster, MD 11 years ago

I never win, I only got a 43, but I'm going to study and try it again later. :)

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Lol. Take it easy mister, it's only a couple of points.

[-] 1 points by SparkyJP (1646) from Westminster, MD 11 years ago

LOL :}

[-] 0 points by April (3196) 11 years ago

That's pretty funny. I'm slightly more Machiavellian than you. I scored 57. But that's still below average. Whew! I almost scared me.

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

The illuminati won't be seeking you out for recruitment with a 57. You are safe. ;-)

[-] -3 points by slizzo (-96) 11 years ago

the bullshit starts in sentence one!

FTFY...

Conservatives and business like to blame unnecessary, poorly thought-out, poorly-executed, money-wasting, business-swamping unbelievably stupid and inefficient government programs outside the scope of the Constitution for most of the problems in society."

at least TRY to be honest

[-] 4 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Do you jerk off with an invisible hand?

[-] 2 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

Lol

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

I'm giving him the invisible finger as we speak.

[+] -4 points by slizzo (-96) 11 years ago

no, tell me about it. how do you do it?

[-] 2 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Use a real hand. There......FTFY

[-] -2 points by slizzo (-96) 11 years ago

so you're using your real hand now?

TMI, dude

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

in your case, it's TWI

[-] 4 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

Thats one of the best things I've ever heard. Staunch supporters of capitalism masturbate with Adam Smith's invisible hand! I'm gonna have to steal that from you. I wonder if they even understood the joke?

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

My jokes are open source & it would appear the meaning slipped right past them.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

By the way what is FTFY?

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

You have to give me the secret invisible handshake first. Ah, what the hell, since it's you....Fixed That For You.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

Ah I see.

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

I bet old jerko didn't even read past the first line of my post.

[-] 4 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

Probably not. They aren't here to exchange ideas or have any kind of meaningful debate, which is why I rarely engage them. They aren't going to sway me to their opinion so whats the point. I'm not going to sway them to my opinion either. I've also decided to quit engaging the hardcore democrats. They are damn near just as bad.

[-] 3 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

I hear you. Life is to short to engage in pointless bickering. If I can't find at least a little bit of common ground with someone else, I don't see much point in wasting my breath on them.

[-] 1 points by MattHolck2 (44) 11 years ago

I learn things here

[-] 1 points by MattHolck2 (44) 11 years ago

right scapegoat the government

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

Quit cloning around.

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 11 years ago

My bad - thought you were a Matt clone.


1 points by MattHolck2 (24) 0 minutes ago

off to the shop to get my computer fixed

[-] 1 points by MattHolck2 (44) 11 years ago

off to the shop to get my computer fixed

[-] 1 points by MattHolck2 (44) 11 years ago

only if adam smith means anything

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 11 years ago

Right if they even know who Adam Smith is!

[-] 1 points by MattHolck2 (44) 11 years ago

the guy putting chemicals together atom by atom

[-] 3 points by TitusMoans (2451) from Boulder City, NV 11 years ago

Your adulation of conservatives and business is somewhat questionable, since neither accomplishes much but to enrich themselves.

The Constitution is a piece of paper like any other piece of paper. If you want to worship it, by all means do so, but don't expect the rest of the world to go along with you.

When you mention all the assinine, money-wasting programs, you forget to mention Santorum's vote on the bridge to nowhere, you omit the top-heavy wasteful war machine, the bloated border patrol, the wasteful intelligence apparatus--the latter three all to defend us from some hobgoblins of the reactionary mind.

I'm all for no vertical government--that means conservative idiots stay out of women's vaginas, people's sexual preferences, their marriage rights, etc, etc, etc. Conservatives want to control other people and make them live by some antiquated standards that have never really worked.

[-] 1 points by slizzo (-96) 11 years ago

My "adulation?" that's funny. Kook assumptions always are.

"is a piece of paper" very intellectual. Maybe it would have more gravitas with you if it was chiseled on stone tablets. Kook intellect is always funny, too.

"Santorum" - yet another assumption about who I blame and let off the hook. And in a shocking development, the assumption is ... Wrong! In a not so shocking development, the assumption is laughable. Kook 1-dimensional thinking always is.

"conservatives want to control people" -- couldn't agree with you more, especially regarding birth control, marriage, etc. but aren't you forgetting the 1000s of social engineering experiments liberals like to test out on the population? they sure want to control the amount of money they let you keep. they want to control how much sugary drink you can have at once. they want compete control over your healthcare. they want to control who you can hire and fire. they want control over whatever fashionable alteration of history is en vogue. they want to control what you put in your body.

I could go on, but you get the picture. All these things cut both ways. Both parties suck.

[-] 2 points by TitusMoans (2451) from Boulder City, NV 11 years ago

Frankly, my slizzo, I don't give a damn. What you do or believe is up to you, just give me the same options.

[-] 1 points by slizzo (-96) 11 years ago

you, too, can believe what makes you feel better. but don't tell me what I believe or who I support. you can always ask. I don't avoid questions like most of the raging angries here do.

[-] 1 points by HempTwister (667) from Little Rock, AR 11 years ago

FTFY?