Welcome login | signup

Forum Post: [DELETED]

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 21, 2011, 10:32 a.m. EST by anonymous ()
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

[DELETED]

13 Comments

[-] 2 points by nucleus (3291) 12 years ago

SPAM

First, richardkentgates richardkentgates fredastaire etc. spams here mercilessly to find people to write for his site for free so he can make money on their work ... when he does not even support OWS.

Then the TROLL complains here about a REAL website that he imagines is competing with him, and tries to get OWS supporters to act against it.

TROLL ALERT

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 12 years ago

"richardkentgates" = long-outed TROLL

In fact, in October he won the "Troll Award" as THE WORST TROLL on this forum:

http://occupywallst.org/forum/winner-troll-award-winner-is-richardgates/

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 1 points by Alexman8711 (23) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

actually...that would explain my confusion...because I see absolutely nothing wrong with the thread he linked...or the forum he linked...

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

TIOUAISE is a fake supporter. pretending to support the movement but espouses socialist propaganda to make to movement seem far left.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 12 years ago

B U L L S H I T - Nobody considers me "far left". I've never been Marxist, communist or anything of the sort. If one day I ever decided to espouse socialism, it would be Christic socialism, i.e. based on the teachings of Jesus.

Why did "richardkentgates" win the "Troll Award" as THE WORST TROLL on this forum? Because of his constant LIES:

http://occupywallst.org/forum/winner-troll-award-winner-is-richardgates/

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

There are also, so far as I have seen, at least three people here going under variations of the name "RichardGates," which only adds to the confusion he is intending to sow. I have seen NO Reason Whatsoever to think that themultitude.org is illegitimate, and so I challenge RicharGates, or anyone else who reads this and agree's with him, to back that implication with factual, verifyable data and not just inuendo!

It appears to me that they are a forum far more conducive to rational thought and planning than this site is, despite the merits of this site's free-for-all argumentation

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 1 points by Alexman8711 (23) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

There's a lot to go through on that forum, and the thread that you linked does not really show that they have 1% motives behind them. Perhaps I am being ridiculous in believing that bumping threads can help, but there really are constantly new threads/posts being made in this forum that make it hard to keep up unless you either leave the thread open or bookmark it. Just now this thread has become the 20th thread from the top, or around there. If you could, can you post a link to another thread that seems to favor the ideas of the 1%ers?

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

my post says nothing about 1%, your skills are weak.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by rosewood (543) 12 years ago

Wow...amazing how the paid operatives work, and they always use the 99% to do their dirty work...and we do it.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

indeed

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 0 points by Var (195) 12 years ago

Who are those people anyway? I see a bunch of propaganda there that is rather 1%er.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) 12 years ago

idk. good question.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink

[-] 0 points by Var (195) 12 years ago

The registration info is private. Registered with godaddy.com.

↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink