Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: [DELETED]

Posted 1 year ago on Jan. 20, 2013, 6:48 a.m. EST by anonymous ()
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

[DELETED]

21 Comments

21 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34876) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Yep - didn't vote for shrub.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

But did you vote for shrub part2? Again?? http://dillsnapcogitation.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/obama-bush-53814.jpg

http://neoavatara.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/obama-bush-hug.jpg

http://media.beta.photobucket.com/user/jazzmantim3_2007/media/Bush-Obama-Crimes.jpg.html?filters[term]=obama%20and%20bush%20kissing&filters[primary]=images#/user/Rasral/media/mccain_obama_KsC.jpg.html?filters%5Bterm%5D=obama%20and%20bush%20kissing&filters%5Bprimary%5D=images&_suid=135870687115605733037714449467

http://sabbah.biz/mt/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Bush_Obama_by_funkwood-300x300.jpg

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34876) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

U mean shrub on steroids? Nope didn't vote 4 that either.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

We can't let Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex win, so to keep that from happening, what we need to do is vote for Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex because if we don’t vote against Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex by voting for Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex, then Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex Wins! And we can’t let that happen! Because then Wall Street and the Military-Industrial Complex might win! See how that works? lol

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34876) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

I am for curing the ILL's of society : "this does not require guns - or it really really should not. It Should reduce the need for em."

1 - Influenced government

2 - CorpoRAT goal

Their image of the future

3 - Consider the facts around the country around the world - you should then agree.

4 - if left as is - Wash-up time for breakfast


Food 4 Thought - TWEET - it.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Huh?

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34876) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

The president does not matter except that mittens would have sent us straight to hell

What matters is getting the people involved.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Bullshit lol When Bush Did What Obama's Doing, Were You Mad? (FLYER) http://stpeteforpeace.org/obama.html

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (34876) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

1/21/2013 coming up - I think I like MLK celebration better then the inaugural.

King: I Have a Dream Obama: I Have a Drone.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

I'll take that as a Yes you Did. Dog-shit-with-cheese-on-it is at least "better" than Dog-shit-without-cheese-on-it so that's why we should eat Dog-shit-with-cheese, because it's "better". And besides, It's What's For Dinner :-)

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

[Reposted from HBO.com / Real Time with Bill Maher / Occupy Wall Street]

"You're mute if you ever lose the ability to cut and paste." -So Long

I might go mute from shock if you ever say anything that's even half-way intelligent. lol

I sling dissent through my posts like they six-shooters and it's the Wild West in the Dirty South around here...

What's a matter? you ain't never seen no Revolutionary on a Horse before?? lol

"The "D" is silent hillbilly..." :-)


2PAC & James Brown "Am I Wrong Cuz I Wanna Get It On Till I Die....Get It On Till I Die..." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWKF6kmvWT4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdFJ3IGCY6w

[-] 1 points by highlander (-163) 1 year ago

I bet the French are feeling the same about Hollande. With what is going on in Mali.

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

I am not a single issue voter - even if it is your issue.


If the breaks failed on your car, would you use the best alternative - the least of evils - and use the emergency break - or would you jump out of the car?


No matter how much YOU like a third party candidate – here is the math
This is not about bush or Gore or Nader or why Gore lost or
chads or recounts or scoutus
This is ALL about the 2000 Florida math.
The “final” SCOTUS tally:

bush = 2912790
Gore = 2912253
Nader.. = 97488

So bush “won” by 537 votes


it would be reasonable to surmise that at least 80% of third party Nader votes would have gone to Gore – giving him a clear victory.
BUT
Lets be much less generous to Gore and give him a tiny 1% edge in splitting up the third party Nader votes:

Give bush 49.5% = 48257
Give Gore 50.5% = 49231

So

bush = 2912790 + 48257 = 2961047
Gore = 2912253 + 49231 = 2961484

A 437 vote victory for Gore

who would have
read his PDBs &
avoided 911 &
not lied about wmds &
not invaded Iraq


The issue here is – for all of the 2000 third party voters who were
SO PROUD of themselves - to vote for Nader -
can they now admit that they may have been very happy to vote for
third party Nader –
even though it led to
the worst disaster in America since the Civil War?

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

There has Never been a Revolution that Endorses the Status Quo

"All the energy wasted on political sites could be used to create new options. New parties. New solutions. You could be having a major impact on your local area, a total rethinking of what is right, and what is reality. Instead, you are simply following the example of the establishment. Vote on fear. Allow fear to keep you paralyzed.

This is bullshit. This is not what is needed. This is the exact opposite of what is needed. We dont need more people saying "Vote A or we get B" A and B are poison! How could you endorse either?"

http://occupywallst.org/forum/there-has-never-been-a-revolution-that-endorses-th/

[-] 0 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Oh, PLEASE lol Not More of this status-quo defending Bullshit. Why don't you go post on the HBO Forum? you would fit in nicely there :-)

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

simple question - do you have the courage to answer it? true or false?
If Nader was not a candidate in Florida -
Gore would have won Florida & the presidency in 2000

simple question - do you have the courage to answer it? true or false?

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Welcome to the Duopoly http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/03/america-duopoly-money-politics

And around and around and around we go....

Chasing our tails....chasing the "other side's" tails.... like idiots. http://occupywallst.org/forum/welcome-to-the-duopoly/

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Do you have the courage to do some research? And to accept that fact that both parties serve Wall Street and the greedy special interests of the 1% over the American People? The game is rigged.

"In the US, there is basically one party - the business party. It has two factions, called Democrats and Republicans, which are somewhat different but carry out variations on the same policies. By and large, I am opposed to those policies. As is most of the population." -Noam Chomsky http://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2010/09/war-crimes-interview-obama

http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/1992----02.htm

[-] 0 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

I don't debate with cowards
bye bye

[-] 0 points by zippyhorn (-5) 1 year ago

Haha! You so brave with that keyboard.

[-] 0 points by KevinPotts (363) 1 year ago

Austerity's Agent / The Real Obama Emerges (Again) by JILL STEIN http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/01/18/the-real-obama-emerges-again/