Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: OWS greatest success=Extremist Tea Party defeat? Demint & Armey gone!

Posted 2 years ago on Dec. 6, 2012, 10:37 a.m. EST by VQkag2 (16478)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement



Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

It's a long, long, road!


[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Like this, Turbo?


And one of your friends is still active (although we defeated his reelection!)

[-] 2 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

The fact that Americans get more upset with the people they dont vote for, as opposed to the ones they do who then blatantly disrespect them repeatedly afterwards, is pretty ironic.

The land of democracy has no ability to control the people they vote for, instead each side blaming the other for 4 years straight while their own walks all over their face.

Personally I could care less about tea people, Ive never put any faith in them.

Who do you put your faith in? Which political group is trampling all over your rights, your income and your future?

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

I focus on the issues regarding politicians, and I put my "faith"? in the people.

The political group that the "people" are fighting are the corporatist, oligarchs who we have allowed to capture our government by being brainwashed into apathy.

Wanna continue your 'apathy brainwashing'?

[-] 3 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

Out of all the options and aspects of managing a society/community/area, electing politicians and crossing one's fingers is one of the most apathetic by far.

Electing them and then attempting to constantly harass them in hopes they don't screw us over, desperately trying to get them to do even the simplest things like not allowing poisonous chemicals to be injected into the ground, into the food and into the air, will get you exactly what we have- playing second fiddle in a top down power structure, pleading for someone or anyone to please do what is right.

There are a lot of ways to manage a society. Centralized representative power is one of the worst, and leads to people being so disenfranchised that they literally have no idea what is going on.

[-] -1 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

I didn't say "cross ones fingers" "hopes they don't screw us over".

I reject that strategy & obviously do not submit to your once again dishonest description of what I support.

You're once again trying to attach a falsehood as my position because you cannot argue your position honestly.

Same trick.

Perhaps you should just say you don't support competition for private banksters & government union jobs.

You're allowed. (just wrong)

[-] 3 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

You don't have to say it, thats what that is. If you were saying it, then you wouldn't be endorsing it, so there ya go. "Pressuring politicians" instead of simply doing it yourself is the essence of apathy when compared to the work itself.

Doing nothing and "pressuring politicians" are much closer in terms of the work involved than the extreme opposite end, the exact opposite of apathy, which is Do it Ourselves. That type of governance is something that is not even considered, we have slid so far.

[-] 0 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Pressuring politicians, protest, direct action, voting, boycotts, occupations, etc is not doing nothing, or hoping, or crossing fingers.

Your definition is ridiculous, I reject it.

In fact all these actions represent the end of apathy & the beginnings of involvement by the people in this effort to take our government back from the right wing libertarian extremist oligarchs who have taken it.

"type of governance"????? We just gotta take our government back from the oligarchs!!

We will evolve to direct democracy in due course.

[-] 3 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

Boycotts are an example of actual self governance, as people are aware of their role in their communities, that is correct. Being aware of what one is doing with the equity of their work is crucial, something we are currently very bad at.

The rest is crossing fingers after it is finished, as you are hoping that one action leads to another, the main blocking point being the middle man (the politician). I'm not saying its worthless, as you are right, it gets people involved. But the amount of effort in doing so is nothing compared to the amount of effort needed usually to manage the desired end result.

Just look at occupy. What was the most work? Protesting or managing the actual occupation and keeping things moving? Clearly the latter.

I specifically separated doing nothing from "pressuring politicians" in hopes of avoiding any reply that would attempt to lump them together, as they are clearly separate.

But as usual, it all gets lumped together regardless.

[-] 0 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Well you do not get to define apathy, involvement, or doing nothing for other people, nor do you get to characterize others positions.

Pressuring politicians, is but one small aspect of the involvement, action we are in the midst of.

We have had some success, but our momentum is only growing.

We must see to it that the "we're in this together" philosophy succeeds and the "you're on your own" mentality is rejected.

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

"The right wings mistake"


Live by the sword......., Ride the tiger, risk getting bit.

"Instant karma"

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

Success!! Tea party talking split from repub party!


Gotta love it

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (-157) 7 months ago

They are a bunch of die-hard conservative right wing wackos who refuse to compromise on anything. They will never be taken seriously by at least 1/2 of the people but they do have some influence on the other 1/2. They also, no doubt whatsoever, get people killed with their outrageous 'fear the government', 'Democrats hate the troops', 'Socialism is upon us', 'coming to get our guns' CRAP. I don't think they are necessarily bad people but they certainly are FXXXXXX STUPID. At least when it comes to politics. I would literally prefer flipping a coin on every issue then to vote any of those wackos into high office.

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

Wackos should be voted out of course we agree on that.

Regardless of parties, we must vote on the issues and pressure all pols to submit to our will rather than their paymasters.

Of course our effort to correct the unfair election/campaign laws must continue to grow.

Don't be discouraged. Dwell on the goal. Be aware of the obstacles against us but we can't let difficulty paralyze us.

Stay strong, the wackos (oligarch puppets) will be defeated.

And encourage the wacko infighting:


We should encourage this wackos write in campaign. No?

Does voting matter?:

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

Can you believe this?


unraveling before our eyes. Natural, evolutionary, self destruction as a result of narrow appeal, & uncompromising, politics of personal destruction.

A new party is possible if you fight for it!

Exciting isn't it?

[-] 2 points by StillModestCapitalist (-157) 7 months ago

A third party would be fantastic just as long as it were truly a 'third' (or fourth). Not just an extreme sect of one or the other. After all, look at the Tea Party. They are basically, just Republicans on steroids.

[-] 3 points by turbocharger (1718) 7 months ago

I'd take a second party at this point.

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Pleased w/ party cannibalization then.?


We should nurture/encourage this self destructive phenom, no?

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (-157) 6 months ago

Good one. The party we have now is the party of corruption.

[-] 0 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Agreed, mostly I want to force govt to serve people as opposed the corporations.

3rd party access will require major changes to current law.

Overturning cit united, public financing of campaigns (as well as other items) are critical goals we are still fighting for.

Tea party/repubs are cannibalizing themselves. It's natural, cyclical, even evolutionary.

Give 'em enough rope, and keep a good hold of that rope and all will progress as it should.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (-157) 7 months ago

I have one or more stalkers playing their games again. You may have one as well. All of your most recent comments have been marked down once within the last hour. It wasn't me. I'm marking them back up.

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

You'reonyourown-isms decline continues!



[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

page jammed my computer

[-] 3 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Worked ok for me. Rush can have that affect on computers.

Sorry about that. good article though.

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

someone's newfew got paid to put up

an overly complicated website up for the corp

people need justification to earn money

[-] 2 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Nepotism rearing it's ugly head.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

it's funny

most corps have overly complicated sites

[-] 2 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

And never good honest info!

[-] 2 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Repub civil war upd: Conserv extremists repubs threatening less extreme repubs.


C'mon this has got to be fun to watch, no?

[-] 1 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Repubs Supporting gays is OWS winning, & Tea party losing!!


Duh!! Winning.

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

I still need a job

[-] 2 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Me too. And also like you, I can't let my real needs, be an excuse for inaction in the battles for human rights, anti war, poverty, environment, and so forth.

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago

What difference could it possibly make, they are already as low as they can go. A break from Rush could bring on a few more suckers! For both!

[-] 3 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Just more fodder. And more entertainment.

Just yesterday they are dealing with fallout.


Aaaaaaaah ha ha ha.

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago

Remember, they are zombies, they don't go through normal human dilemmas.


[-] 2 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Right. I remember. They wanna eat my brain.

[-] 3 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

Why have you become obsessed with boosting a post whose headline suggests the biggest gain of OWS is that two tea nuts lost an election?

You;ve been boosting this thing incessantly for months, mostly with links that have nothing to do with the topic on hand.

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

I am not obsessed. Just determined.

(It clearly states "tea Party defeat". The 2 leaders (still!) defeat illustrates the extremist tea party defeat, and represents success for progressive agenda.

Does that help you understand?

[-] 2 points by turbocharger (1718) 6 months ago

Theres 23 postings of you talking to yourself on this, in just the last month.

So once a day you log onto this account, and find your old post, and then talk to yourself? That is quite a determined spirit, I will give you that. I think the headline makes the whole thing look a bit amateur, like ows actually humors this election nonsense, but thats imo.

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

How "the headline" "looks" to you is not relevant.

And as I recall Demint retired, no election involved.

What about Army?

Clearly we defeated those extremist tea partiers with street action unrelated to elections.

Why do you keep bringing up elections/partisanship.?

[-] 2 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Posting important info on our efforts is not "talking to myself".

Does that personal attack reflect the weakness of your position on the substance of the post.?

elections are just one aspect of our fight. These 2 no longer hold office but still represent a threat to progressive efforts.

And I do not speak for Occupy. Do you?

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 7 months ago

Suicidal Repub/Tea tendencies:


"Give 'em enough rope...."

I have to laugh

[-] -1 points by 99nproud (2697) 6 months ago

Cannibalistic opponents are our best customers

Tennessee meltdown?


keep fightin'

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 2 years ago

Some, not all, or much.

Remember, just weeks ago, most of the voices on here were EQUATING DeMints with Dems!!! They are still here, just a little stymied.

Gotta move on!!

Progress is the best success!!

[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Jon Stewart always on point.

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago

Hey I'm having probs with the USPS thing. A person who I consider not a complete unicorn chaser seriously thinks Dems are responsible for the the poison pill!! What do you have on this? Give me links CUZ it's GirlFriday!

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago

spread it!

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

This article indicates current efforts by both parties to cut costs/jobs from USPS.


I think it is important to note that Dems are never 100% innocent. Certainly the effort to save postal jobs are only being fought by Dems. But for different reasons some dems wind up on the wrong side of an issue.

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

I will spread it and find some info on the initial USPS pension law.

Here is some info, not quite the evidence of who created the problem.


[-] 0 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago


I swear, if I find out that Dems are sinking the Post Office (Ben's PO) I will wage war!!

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

I think the nature ofthe passage in 12/2006 was fast and done in a secretive way. Some Dems might have supported it but Repubs controlled the house and pushed it through after the 2006 election that brought dems back to power in the house.

If Dems had the House it never would have been brought to the floor.

[-] 0 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago

Please tell GF it's too messy for me.

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Oh boy. She's a tough one. If I see the comment I may engage.

[-] 0 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 1 year ago


[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago


[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Your right. Just thought I'd throw out the new updates, for any interested.

[-] 2 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 2 years ago

Bye Demint...

Sorry Heritage RW, Fascist freak show ORG !!!!

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

LOL. We'll miss him, but he won't be far, and the battles with him, Heritage and neocon tea party continue.

They ain't dead yet. Wounded. But work remains.

[-] 0 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 2 years ago


Get that shit OUT!!!

Dees Bitches Trool'n!! With Power!!

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

But they lack righteous power.

They cannot win if we are fighting properly.

[-] 1 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 2 years ago


Monsters ALWAYS come back!!

76/80 ~ 88 ~ 2000/08 - 10!!

They always can, they own the media, they own the minds.


[-] 0 points by WSmith (1579) from Cornelius, OR 2 years ago

How is this interest rate determined? We trust that the banking system is setting today’s rate based on its best guess about the future worth of the money. And we assume that guess is based, in turn, on the cumulative market predictions of countless lenders and borrowers all over the world about the future supply and demand for the dough.

But suppose our assumption is wrong. Suppose the bankers are manipulating the interest rate so they can place bets with the money you lend or repay them – bets that will pay off big for them because they have inside information on what the market is really predicting, which they’re not sharing with you.

That would be a mammoth violation of public trust. And it would amount to a rip-off of almost cosmic proportion – trillions of dollars that you and I and other average people would otherwise have received or saved on our lending and borrowing that have been going instead to the bankers. It would make the other abuses of trust we’ve witnessed look like child’s play by comparison.

http://current.com/GetCurrent ….

This is insider trading on a gigantic scale. It makes the bankers winners and the rest of us – whose money they’ve used to make their bets – losers and chumps.

[-] 0 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Not surprised. Sounds like LIBOR, & a dozen other banking scams they have concocted.

They are the 1% corp oligarchs we are fighting against.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

As long as he leaves.......

[-] 3 points by inclusionman (7064) 1 year ago

Legacy of Occupy! 1st tremor.


That's us shaken things up.


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 1 year ago

If Turd Blossom's lips are moving than he is probably lying. The greatest show on earth.


[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

LOL. Let the repub/tea party battles commence!!!! Release the hounds!!!

[-] -1 points by highlander (-163) 2 years ago

He is probably disgusted with the lapdog mentality of Boehner and gang; Boehner did dismiss two Tea Party Congressman from the negotiating committee. I wish he stayed. Because if everyone jumps on the wagon, then why bother working to earn wealth? What is the endgame?

[-] 2 points by imagine40 (383) 1 year ago

Ashley Judd could beat the tea party candidate that "primaries" McConnell.


This is the best entertainment she could provide.

[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Success! Repubs eating themselves alive.



[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Kochs reboot after failure.


More evidence that the enemy of the 99% is on the ropes.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Evidence of Tea party chaos, & Occupy success.


[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago
[-] -2 points by highlander (-163) 2 years ago

I am, honestly, sorry he is gone. We do need cuts, I am against Obamacare, and I have no desire to see federal funding of a women's history museum

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

You don't like healthcare for all OR women?. But you're not "rape confused" are you.?

[-] 0 points by highlander (-163) 2 years ago

I like healthcare. My initial argument when Obama first brought up this idea was that costs needed to go down first. I believed Obama, trying to impliment universal health care with the current system, was building upon the debt without providing adequate universal care. I wished Obama first tried to lower health care costs, making each health care dollar go further, then tried to pass ACA a few years later. I love women; I am married to one. When we are mired in a trilion dollar budget deficit, what do we cut from what department to fund a museum in a society where the role of women in history is well known; in a society where the opportunities for men and women are the same and there are ample examples, today, of successful women?

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Here's a more recent story on VT single payer cost savings health care effort.


[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

The cost of a museum is trivial, & insignificant, Our women are well worth it I won't dignify your opposition with any more of a response on that.

The ACA (Obamacare) will cut healthcare costs. However I would agree much more cost reduction must occur. I submit WE must agitate all pols for just that goal!

Certainly we will have lower costs if we all agitate our respective states to implement a public option (as Obamacare allows) like VT & Oregon are doing.


That will go the longest way to cut costs by putting the criminal private health insurance corps out of business. Wecan also insist on allowing govt negotiate with big pharma for lower drug prices.

[-] 1 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Neocon/repub disarray.


They're failure is our success.

[-] -1 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

No... he's leaving because he's an opportunist just like the rest of us.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

I believe it was Demints pushing of tea party candidates, Odonnel, ,Akin. Mourdock that repubs think screwed their chance of taking back the Senate.

Demints been threatening to "primary" any repub who would compromise on the fiscal cliff wealthy tax cuts, Repub leadership smacked demint down, demint decided he could work against moderate repubs outside.

He's a right wing wacko extremist. Good riddance. The greatest threat he presents is to the moderate republicans. They reap what they've sown. LOL

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Speak for yourself. I think he ssaw the weakness of the tea party in the senate. He did cause the repubs to lose at least 2 senate seats (Akin, Mourdock).

And I'm sure he's been getting the cold shoulder the last few weeks as one repub after the other backs away from the extremist Norquist, and defending tax cuts for millionaires & billionaires.

I understand he threatened primary fights against any who dared such positions and they laughed in his face.

Did you hear that?

[-] 0 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

You're too close to the fire; step away from the fire.

Do you want to hear what baseline Conservatives have been saying for well over thirty years now? They've been saying we MUST raise Federal taxes; can you guess who they want to tax? That's right - they want to tax the rich and all those corporations which for years and years have paid either virtually nothing or absolutely zero. The cliff is actually mighty attractive to both sides, don'tcha think?

Well, except the Re-pubs who are always willing to cut a deal to stay in power. Their fear, of course, is that all those lobbying dollars will go the Dems.

The problem, as well all know, is that none of those in Congress, of any denomination, is willing to raise taxes high enough.

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Oh so conservatives want to raise taxes on the rich.? LMFAO.


How do you exlain that no conservative has voted for a tax rate increase in 20 years, & that 95% of repubs signed the norquist no tax increase pledge.

I think you are either dishonest or ignorant.


[-] -1 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

Out here in the country we have these alternate beings which would prefer to self-identify as "conservative." Do you think they favor all this corruption in Congress?

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

Self identify?

What's that and in what way did they find themselves to be "alternate beings"? Which term also begs a definition of the most exact nature.

[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

Obvious TP/rep desperation when they resort to this.


A little entertainment this morning.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 1 year ago

There is something inherently wrong with so called "professionals" making such a video.

A decided lack of maturity.

Has it become endemic to the party itself?

Yes. It appears to be permanently stuck in junior high, from Boehner on down.

[-] 2 points by repubsRtheprob (1209) 1 year ago

They ARE like children. And the logic, as well as mentality happily wallows in that immature mud because that is what appeals to the extremists of their base.

They need a time out from holding power!!

[-] -1 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

I self identify as Native American but the reality is that I'm just an American in brown skin; self identity is a matter of personal choice.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

That's pretty vague on the first part and completely ignores the second part.

I expected better at this juncture.

[-] -2 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

You know what they say, you shooz, you lose...

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8719) 2 years ago

Soooo lame!

[-] 0 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

It was on the fly... sooner or later, someone had to say it.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

S'funny, I've never heard that.

Conse(R)vative thing?

Of course, in a situation like this, one must ask you, who's they?

[-] -1 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

Paranoia, I sense paranoia. Who's they? Well, the alternative beings that live under your bed, of course. And so, I've often head it said: you shooz, you lose.

Don't worry, it'll be good as a pig's foot in the morning.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

That's because you're a paranoid sort. Prone, like most conse(R)vatives here, to insults.

[-] -2 points by GenerationOfPeace (-15) 2 years ago

Make government smaller! Stop taxing us man!! Generation Of Peace! Who's with me!!'

[-] 0 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

I love peace signs.

[-] 0 points by GenerationOfPeace (-15) 2 years ago

But seriously though, that's like what our generation is all about! we're the Generation Of Peace

[-] 1 points by RedDragon (-161) 2 years ago

I was serious, too. I like cool people.

[-] -1 points by GenerationOfPeace (-15) 2 years ago

Generation Of Peace! acronyms!

[-] -1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

I've been saying all along there's too many States with competing laws and taxation and redundant court systems........................:)


[-] -2 points by texarkana (-1) 2 years ago

Demint is a great man and will still be a strong Conservative force for positive change and the TEA Party agenda,so don't wet your little panties with excitement just yet you leftwing,lilly livered,yellow bellied zealots.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Repub split growing! Is this why Demint retreated?


[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

He only poses a threat to the republican party.

He recently threatened to mount primary challenges to repubs willing to compromise on taxes.

Repub leadership slapped him down, And the little sore loser, little child quit!

LOL. But he remains committed to challenging repubs in the primaries with extremists, & I welcome his efforts. He's the gift the keeps on giving.


[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (24121) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

aAHhahahahaha you are so deluded - he is going off to join the other block heads at the Heritage foundation - where I suppose he will try to update school books ( among doing other things ) to say that the dinosaurs died off due to over consumption by people.

[-] -1 points by texarkana (-1) 2 years ago

Son, you're just howlin at the moon. Do you have a problem discussing anything of substance? Or do just fly by buzzin in everybody's ear.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Bill Kristol knows conservatives have been beaten by progressives (like OWS)


More evidence the extremists are losing!

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (24121) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Now you are talking to your self - as you have absolutely nothing of substance or value to offer - though you are kinda funny - but that is just sad really - cause you can't help how you were raised.

[-] -1 points by texarkana (-1) 2 years ago

Partner it's been nice but you got a whole lot of growing up to do before you can really hold your own in a ring of conversation and not come out with a shiner.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (24121) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Hahahaha you get a lot of those(?) have ya? Not surprising. Nope not at all surprising.

[-] 0 points by texarkana (-1) 2 years ago

Now see? That's what I was trying to tell you. You're a walking plague of babbling mumble's and your Mama should have taught you better and your Daddy should have took a rawhide switch to you.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (24121) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Remembrin good times with the folks are ya? You develop calluses from your Ol man's attentions with the Ol leather strap?

[-] -1 points by texarkana (-1) 2 years ago

Brush your teeth and say your prayers little one and kiss your Mama good night Son.

[-] -2 points by lignite (-303) 2 years ago

extremist Tea party------------------------------ That is way too funny, The Tea Party never had one arrest like the numerous ones the ows loons have had. Ows gatherings only amounted to, numerous rapes, theft, violence, arrest, disgusting filth, and a occasional murder or two

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Hannity knows OWS right on Immigration.


More evidence of our defeat of the right wing wackos

[-] -2 points by lignite (-303) 2 years ago

Maybe so but the big winner was my State "Mich" and the right to work. What a good fucking day it is

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Not for long corp shill boy

I thought you said you part of the C.S.A.

Please clarify the true meaning of the Confederate flag


[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 2 years ago

The Koch brothers are the ONLY winners.

Step "right" down to working for less.

Can you undercut your brother?

[-] -3 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 2 years ago

To VQuack "the isolated incidents of violent crime" to not represent OWS positions, but the NON EXISTENT incidents of violent crime DO represent the Tea Party's "extreme" nature! He's a man of logic and reason after all.

He will also gleefully misrepresent the Tea Party and their positions but will scream to high heavens if someone calls OWS a bunch of unwashed, hippies without jobs or accountability. He's a man of consistency and fairness after all.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

The extremist Tea party I refer to is the positions they take.

Anti universal healthcare, anti safety net, pro medicare voucherization, pro SS privatization, and so forth as well as the wacky positions.

Y'know the magic uterus wing, and the "earth is only 10k years old" wing.

Occupy stand for the 99%, Tea party is a koch bros created astro turf org that pushes extremist libertarian dogma.

[+] -4 points by BetsyRoss (-744) 2 years ago

Thanks for proving that you believe that "isolated incidents" of stupidity represent all Tea Party positions. Logic and reason there again buddy.

Using the exact same methodology and criteria I can state that Occupy is a Soros created and funded astro turf org that pushes extremist, socialist dogma.

You throw a fit if you THINK I'm "trying to speak for you"-but have no problem at all PROMOTING a group that PRESUMES to SPEAK for 99% of this country. Hypocrite.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Another one.


Whatta ya think? You support these acts? Does this represent thetea party well.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Maybe you missed these items, or you wouldn't say non existent.


[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

I ain't pitched no fit, just asked you not to speak for me. I do not, nor do I pretend to speak for anyone but myself!

I do not believe these violent incidents represent all tea party positions, never said it, never would. I linked these violent incidents because you and your friend above were falsely claiming the tea party was never violent/or arrested.

I simply state again.

The OWS extremist positions are in support of progressive change that benefits the 99%.

Tea party extremist positions are in support of conservative policies that benefit the 1% oligarchs.


[-] 0 points by lignite (-303) 2 years ago

You are right