Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Literacy Wanted

Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 15, 2011, 4:02 a.m. EST by riethc (1149)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I titled this polemically because I see that we have a massive intellectual vacuum on this forum being filled with complete nonsense. If you do not understand the concepts in this article, please leave questions in the comments. We need people who know what this is, and what it means: Literacy Wanted

There are two bills in Congressional committee waiting to be brought to the floor of Congress: Marcy Kaptur's HR 1489 and Maurice Hinchey's HR 2451. If either of these two bills are passed by Congress, it will restore the Glass-Steagall Act, a law which had kept financial institutions separate, by enforcing by law that banks either be commercial banking institutions (mortgages, savings, etc.) or financial investment institutions (derivatives, CDOs, etc.).

Originally, this law came into being in 1933 during the Great Depression. Over time, its provisions had been eroded by many new laws until it was, for the most part, completely overturned in 1999 with the Financial Services Modernization Act (aka. the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act).

Congressmen, such as Byron Dorgan, spoke on the floor of Congress before the vote on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and warned that this would lead to a disaster in the financial system. (1) Dorgan goes as far a forecasting the collapse of the financial markets and the ensuing bailouts.

Now, over ten years after the repeal of Glass-Steagall, we can see the repercussions of removing the firewall between investment and commercial banking. Restoring the Glass-Steagall Act now, will break up the "too big to fail" banks and force them to sink or swim based on their own fiscal integrity.

No more bailouts for the banks. Support HR 1489 and HR 2451. Demand Glass-Steagall now!

Reference: 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnO_SH-4WU&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL325E5EF5DAB7D072

63 Comments

63 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 5 points by NeoEconomist (19) 12 years ago

Yeah, reinstating the Glass-Steagall act would be one of the very few good ideas around here (as opposed to anti-banking/anti-capitalistic nonsense)

[-] 3 points by DirtyHippie (200) 12 years ago

H.R. 1489 Return to Prudent Banking Act has 46 co-sponsors and has been sitting in sub-committee since May. It will die there if no action is taken on the bill. Write to your representative and demand that Congress takes action on the bill either in the House sub-committee or by introducing it in the Senate.

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by DirtyHippie (200) 12 years ago

fixed

[-] 3 points by SanityScribe (452) 12 years ago

This law kept commercial banks seperate from investments banks.

For example used to be...

You had the bank where you cash your check, and had your checking account. Then you had the bank where you bought investments. They where seperate.

Now... They are intertwined. The bank can operate both.

[-] 3 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Yes, and by separating the commercial banking from the investment side, we'll bankrupt many of the "bad" banks while preserving institutions that can distribute necessary credit to run the economy.

[-] 1 points by SanityScribe (452) 12 years ago

I took "Literacy Wanted" and "We need people who know what this is, and what it means" as somebody looking for easy explaination, so I gave it a shot.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It should be restated again and again. It'll be helpful if you do so.

[-] 1 points by SanityScribe (452) 12 years ago

yeah....So why ya asking me then? lol

[-] 2 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

I'm just making sure that you know what it will mean if OWS makes HR 1489 its main sticking point. Many people do not understand the strength of reinstating The Glass-Steagall Act in the current situation.

[-] 1 points by SanityScribe (452) 12 years ago

Yes I do. thank you, I did not even know anybody had anything to put forth to repeal it tho, that would be great. But I bet they take it out of whatever other bill they have it attached too.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

HR 2451 is a bill that stands on its own: It will reinstate The Glass-Steagall Act, not repeal it.

[-] 1 points by SanityScribe (452) 12 years ago

Even better then an attachment. That's good, hope they can get it through.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

I'm bringing it up here so that OWSers know what it is. If we can get this out into the public discussion, and enough people are able to speak about it intelligently, in front of cameras, we can force Congress to bring it to a vote.

[-] 1 points by SamuelAdams (119) 12 years ago

"I titled this polemically because I see that we have a massive intellectual vacuum IN THIS COUNTRY being filled with complete nonsense."

I fixed your typo!

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

NICE! lol

I might actually use that. Thanks.

[-] 1 points by Socrates469bc (608) from New York, NY 12 years ago

We need to pass financial regulations in concert with the major financial world: London Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong.

Whatever our political inclinations, the reality is that constrictive regulations in one country will result in businesses moving off-shore. Unless... there is a globally level and fair playing field.

We need FAIR trade. FAIR trade is not Free trade. Regulations, however, need to be implement for all competitors, including foreign competition. Without uniform global regulations, we will only continue to see jobs leave the US..

But let's face it, in the USE every State is it's own fiefdom with it's own regulation. So we need to unify regulation across the States before the rest of the world will take us seriously.

Thus I suggest working on international financial regulations with other worldwide Occupy groups.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Good idea. Have you written an article on it for here yet?

[-] 1 points by Socrates469bc (608) from New York, NY 12 years ago

I have other things I want to write on, but trade policy is not one of them, not to mention that trade policy is not my expertise. I'm hoping other people will take this further and freely call it their own.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It doesn't have to be a great article, just copy what you just wrote in the comments above, and paste it into a post. It'll get the conversation going.

[-] 1 points by Socrates469bc (608) from New York, NY 12 years ago

Sorry I misunderstood. I thought you meant a research paper. But I've probably done what you suggested already, I don't remember. But you are welcome to do it again if you like.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

reinstating the Glass-Steagall

is like locking the house after it has already been robbed

a good idea

but the money is still gone

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It's a necessary first step. We have to cut ties with their debt to start a new financial system based on sound money. What kind of financial system that would be is the next issue here, but I doubt I would get much agreement here, so I just say, Glass-Steagall now!

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

pass it already

how many times must I wait for the first step ?

Emilie Autumn - Let the Record Show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc3lqFySOAc angry music

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

People simply waiting for it is the problem.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Questions welcome!

[-] 1 points by michaelbravo (222) 12 years ago

THERE IS DEFINATLY an intellectual vacume but we need bodies also so endure the ignorance and educate the willing..stupid is as stupid does i believe in the ows movement

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Are you being sarcastic?

[-] 1 points by michaelbravo (222) 12 years ago

no iam not being sarcastic but...i am willing to both acknowledge and put up with the ignorant until they get violent or totally out of hand,,,humanity is multifold and wisdom dosent just come cause someone has the balls to start a rightous movement..i am a humanitarian but i dont like to see every ignorant or opinionated soul and thier club or crowd try to coopt what is at the core a serious movement it must be difficult on the ground in the park with all the dimwits but i hold space for thier education..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QrDLwSgg24

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It was just the spelling, not a big deal. Firefox has spell check built in. Might want to download it.

[-] 1 points by michaelbravo (222) 12 years ago

sUbStanSe Ovar FoRm hehe

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 12 years ago

yes

restore glass steal

but the money has already been gambled away on wall street

[-] 1 points by morriden (128) from Burton, MI 12 years ago

I support this, however I recommending watching this closely as congress tends to attach riders. Sadly well see trillions of dollars in lobbyists doing their damnedest to prevent this.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

This bill was written by Congressmen. You have to understand that The Glass-Steagall Act, if there is a real fight for it, will separate Congress into two camps. From there it can be properly fought out and we as citizens will know who is on our side and who is with the banks.

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

That is IF the darn thing ever gets out of committee. Oh Barrrrrrny....

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It's sad. Massachusetts used to be the state of rebels. Now they can't help but vote for a guy because they feel bad for him. (The only left-handed, gay Jew in Congress, who wrote a book about it!)

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

Yeah but he can still do his job right? =p

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Oh, lol. I was thinking you knew Barney was a shill. He does do a lot of back and forth though, seeming like a good guy at times.

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

Well if I'm not mistaken he's not only on the committee, he's the ranking fucking member. Who knows, maybe I'll write him if I get the chance. (Not that it'll do any good but what the Hell ;)

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

It won't do any good. It has to be forced through.

[-] 1 points by Coreupt (294) 12 years ago

So will they need to hire separate lobbiests?

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

lol Reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act will create two separate groups for finance. Most of the big "investment" banks will simply go bankrupt, due to their own bad investments, and lack of having people's deposits to back them up. There won't be any more "big bank" lobbyists because there employers will no longer exist.

[-] 1 points by jameswestonmusic (222) from Los Angeles, CA 12 years ago

thank you, Occupy needs to stay intelligent. The ones who can teach, do. We all have separate gifts, but the same goal. You know about policy obviously, and I know about music. If you want, check this out.. Have a Powerful day, I'll be in LA ----- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVL05HqFqIY

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Nice! If you can write a song about Glass-Steagall and HR 1489, we'll be set!

[-] 1 points by jameswestonmusic (222) from Los Angeles, CA 12 years ago

HA, bit of a mouthful, but I'm on it brother

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

lol It would be challenging to write, but a good catchy song that puts it simply would peak people's interest.

"It's not that we disagree, We're all just barking up the wrong tree, Now it's time to restore sanity, With Glass-Steagall"

Something along those lines would get the point across. :)

[-] 1 points by jameswestonmusic (222) from Los Angeles, CA 12 years ago

song writing partnership is in the works?? I like the words.. ill sing it today at occupy Los Angeles..

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

"How about 'Banking up the wrong tree' ? Just a thought." - Madcat

Madcat and I were just brainstorming a bit and he came up with this line. Our conversation is below.

[-] 1 points by jameswestonmusic (222) from Los Angeles, CA 12 years ago

yeah! play on words! my fav

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Better get some sleep then if you are occupying tomorrow. I'm going to do the same. Good night.

[-] 1 points by jameswestonmusic (222) from Los Angeles, CA 12 years ago

:) rest up

[-] 0 points by goeib1 (163) 12 years ago

stay intelligent.... when did that start? you all may have a load of inane demands or wishes, but there is very LITTLE intelligence on display with this MOB

[-] 1 points by Esposito (173) 12 years ago

At least get rid of derivatives. They're the major problem in investing. You should only be able to bet on a company doing well.

[-] 2 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

If these banks are separated from their deposits, they will go bankrupt, taking their derivatives with them.

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

Do you happen to know the nuanced differences between the two bills awaiting the floor off the top of your head?

[-] 2 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

Kaptur's bill is the longer of the two. It has provisions to give the banks time to separate their commercial side from their investment activities. It also gives some provisions for keeping individuals from being on the executive boards in both a commercial bank and in an investment bank.

Hichney's bill is much more terse and does not go into extensive provisions on how the banks will separate.

Either one will do the job, but Kaptur's bill has more support in Congress and is written better generally.

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

Nice. I like the idea of going the extra step to keep executive boards separate.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1489ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr1489ih.pdf

You thought the song was a mouthful... ;-)

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

lol It would be challenging to get it out there. A good catchy song that puts it simply would peak people's interest, at least.

"It's not that we disagree, We're all just barking up the wrong tree, Now it's time to restore sanity, With Glass-Steagall"

Something along those lines

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

How about "Banking up the wrong tree" ? Just a thought.

None of my, and I use the term lightly, representation is on any of the committees or I'd start writing some letters. If/when it makes to the floor I sure will.

Thanks for starting this thread by the way.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 12 years ago

"Banking up the wrong tree" would be even better! lol

HR 1489 is already out there in the Occupy movement so it wouldn't be hard to bring it up in committee or a GA.

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 12 years ago

Well, I'm not actually there in New York but I'm going to do my research and bring it up with some local occupiers. I think spreading the word on this is a great idea.

Sleep comes first though. Take care