Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Letter from the President. See what you think. just sayin. trolls need not apply we know your thoughts already.

Posted 12 years ago on March 6, 2012, 7:16 p.m. EST by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

A Comprehensive Approach to Wall Street Reform

By Brian Deese, Deputy Director of the National Economic Council

In the wake of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the President took on fierce lobbying and put in place some of the most sweeping financial reforms in history. These reforms were comprehensive and aimed at solving problems in our system exposed by the financial crisis. The President is fighting daily against special interests who want to roll back, delay, defund, and dismantle these reforms.

Wall Street Reform did many things, including protecting and empowering consumers, and bringing transparency and oversight to previously unregulated and opaque markets and institutions. The Administration chose not to simply re-establish the Glass-Steagall separation between commercial banks and investment banks and opted instead for more comprehensive reforms for several reasons:

Simply going back to Glass-Steagall would not have solved the failures of our modern financial system or prevented the financial crisis that led to the worst financial crisis in our lifetimes: It is important to remember that Glass-Steagall would not have prevented the most dramatic failures in 2008. Glass-Steagall would not have avoided the problematic activities of the institutions that defined this financial crisis -- Fannie and Freddie, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, and Countrywide.

What was required was a more comprehensive set of reforms to solve the roots of our crisis. As the President explained in his State of the Union address:

"I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules. The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system's core purpose: getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, or start a business, or send their kids to college."

In particular, the "Volcker Rule" that the President fought to include in Wall Street Reform goes more directly at some of the risky behaviors behind the recent financial crisis. The Volcker Rule will ban banks from making risky bets when they're dealing with their customers' deposits.

And Wall Street Reform goes further by: Creating a single consumer watchdog agency whose sole job is looking out for working families by protecting them from deceptive and unfair lending practices of mortgage brokers, payday lenders, and debt collectors. Requiring banks to hold more capital so that when they make a bad bet they pay for it, not taxpayers. Preventing any financial company, like AIG, from posing such risk to our economy that we have no choice but for taxpayers to bail them out. We're doing this by forcing them to write in detail how, if they fail, they'll pay the bills; we're putting limits on the size of banks; and we're giving regulators an ability they've never had before to dismantle failing firms without sticking taxpayers with the bill. Increasing transparency by bringing the $600 trillion derivatives market -- which was at the center of the financial crisis -- and other trading out of the shadows. Holding CEO's accountable by taking back bonuses and compensation from failing CEOs, giving shareholders a voice on CEO pay, and protecting whistleblowers who speak out about wrongdoing on Wall Street.

Thank you for signing the petition "Re-establish and maintain the separation between investment banks and commercial banks" and for your participation in the We the People platform.

Check out this response on We the People.

Stay Connected

Stay connected to the White House by signing up for periodic email updates from President Obama and other senior administration officials.

  facebook     Facebook     twitter     Twitter     youtube     YouTube     flickr     Flickr     itunes     iTunes      

This email was sent to dka01@live.com Manage Subscriptions for dka01@live.com Sign Up for Updates from the White House Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111

http://links.whitehouse.gov/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xNjgzNjI2MiZlbWFpbGlkPWRrYTAxQGxpdmUuY29tJnVzZXJpZD1ka2EwMUBsaXZlLmNvbSZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&100&&&http://www.whitehouse.gov/wallstreetreform?utm_source=wethepeople&utm_medium=footer&utm_campaign=wallstreet

http://links.whitehouse.gov/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xNjgzNjI2MiZlbWFpbGlkPWRrYTAxQGxpdmUuY29tJnVzZXJpZD1ka2EwMUBsaXZlLmNvbSZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&101&&&http://www.consumerfinance.gov/

http://links.whitehouse.gov/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xNjgzNjI2MiZlbWFpbGlkPWRrYTAxQGxpdmUuY29tJnVzZXJpZD1ka2EwMUBsaXZlLmNvbSZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&102&&&https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/%21/petition/re-establish-and-maintain-separation-between-investment-banks-and-commercial-banks/ywCMKDfn?utm_source=wethepeople&utm_medium=footer&utm_campaign=wallstreet

http://links.whitehouse.gov/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmbWVzc2FnZWlkPU1EQi1QUkQtQlVMLTIwMTIwMzA3LjYwMDcwNjEmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xNjgzNjI2MiZlbWFpbGlkPWRrYTAxQGxpdmUuY29tJnVzZXJpZD1ka2EwMUBsaXZlLmNvbSZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&103&&&https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#%21/response/comprehensive-approach-wall-street-reform?utm_source=wethepeople&utm_medium=footer&utm_campaign=wallstreet

24 Comments

24 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by mvjobless (370) 12 years ago

The language they use concerning the derivatives market looks purposely vague. That market is by far one of the more destructive aspects of this financial crisis. The feds need to put an end to it, period. Except for the legitimate derivatives used by big ag and some other commodities, they should be banned. And why can't they say they'll reinstate glass steagall and build on that foundation to deal with all the other perversions of the market.

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

I believe that is exactly why we need to continue support for the return of Glass-Stegal. Thank you.

[-] 1 points by DanielBarton (1345) 12 years ago

interesting post i see potential for both harm and good by some of these. hopefully more information will come out in the future

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Yes. I am not pleased by the sound of some of the changes like the way they went with market protection instead of reinstating Glass-Stegal. As for some of the others we will have to see if they have teeth and if they will bite someone.

[-] 1 points by DanielBarton (1345) 12 years ago

yes we will only time will tell

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Well the way things are fucked up in Congress it's unlikely that we will see anything significant get done until after the election. So maybe we will see the Pres try to push some action forward with his programs. So he can make a positive statement going into the election. Anyway it should prove to be a very interesting year.

[-] 1 points by ThunderclapNewman (1083) from Nanty Glo, PA 12 years ago

Unless I'm missing it, I didn't read anywhere that the big financials were going to be broken up into smaller, more easily monitored entities. I think that needs to happen. The big boys grew even bigger after the bail-outs. Something akin to anti-trust laws might serve us well in this case.

[+] -7 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

My thinking as well.A lot of things being talked about in the letter are just getting up and running, so it will take awhile for them to make an entrance. I think we are starting to see some of that. But only time will tell. The thing that bothers me is the alternative they have taken instead of reinstalling Glass- Stegal, I just don't think it has the teeth that Glass-Stegal had.

[-] 1 points by ThunderclapNewman (1083) from Nanty Glo, PA 12 years ago

Thanks for posting this, DK. It's good work.

We have some other bright people here who know this kind of thing forward and backward as well. Please add your thoughts.

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Thank you for taking part.

That is exactly what I am looking for. I want to develop some good material for a direct feedback campaign. What is good what is bad. what could be better and how. We have to own this system and that is going to take communication.

[-] 1 points by ThunderclapNewman (1083) from Nanty Glo, PA 12 years ago

Agreed.

Hope to hear from all forum members on this.

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Me too. No rush. Plenty of time to do some reading and consideration.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by SmeggitySpooge (78) 12 years ago

zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Well that is probably one of your best contributions. Honest statement of your state of being. So concise, I am in awe of your prowess.

[-] -1 points by SmeggitySpooge (78) 12 years ago

At least the only one simple enough for you to grasp.

I really thought some of the others would be within your reach, however, you seldom fail to disappoint me with your remedial comprehension.

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

I'm sorry did you say something?

[-] -1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

Are you sure that you want my response?

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

As long as your honest - yes of coarse. This letter is not something I am celebrating. It is what it is. And I think it could be discussed by concerned individuals. How else am I gonna send back informed reaction. Feed back is essential. How else to let them know if they are cold, warm, hot or on target? We need to own the system like never before, claim it and use it.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

This is typical of the responses that I have seen where the emphasis is on what has been accomplished. What has not been accomplished is diminished. The tone then has a rather dismissive quality about it.

Now, I have said before that some of those petitions are badly written or misinformed.

While the Volker rule is what the banks are having a knipshit about, and is very important, I don't think they were going to get Glass-Steagall back, not because they chose not to, but because they didn't stand a chance. We know why tougher legislation didn't get passed.

[-] 1 points by mvjobless (370) 12 years ago

Reinstating glass steagall would probably have the effect of unwinding alot of transactions, probably in the trillions, currently on the books of the biggest institutions and so the bank lobby I'm sure has lobbied furiously against the reinstatement in order to save their asses. Maybe that is why the feds have to write new law that skirts that issue and leaves all the big banks, well , BIG. Glass Steagall would probably also have a huge effect on the huge derivatives market. They are afraid....

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

Thanks.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 12 years ago

Your welcome. I have always found the responses to be rather disappointing. I did not think that the petition was badly written at all.

[-] 0 points by GreatBallsOfFire (11) 12 years ago

Goodness gracious!

[+] -8 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 12 years ago

I know ( disappointing ) that's why I stopped using the White House petition site. It seemed to be more of a polling place then an actual action site.