Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Lets plan on how we're going to get REAL results. *POST YOUR IDEAS*

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 18, 2011, 11:25 p.m. EST by TaylorBenitez (10)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Well, I'll start. If anyone agrees/disagrees, please comment on how it should be improved or scrapped.

We need to take action. ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER than words. The politicians see we are upset and criticize us. Republicans(besides Paul) insult us and shuns our movement while the democrats pretend they care as a populist platform for Obama.

How would our founding fathers feel if they saw you guys taking shit from our government, letting them rip up the constitution and make us economic slaves. Tax us without representation, then beat us for making a voice against such actions. LAST TIME I CHECKED, they picked up muskets and fought an army superior in numbers and strength. We are superior in numbers, and many military vets would be on OUR side. We need to rise up. It isn't just wall-street, it's our government. We need to bring America back to its founding principles.

32 Comments

32 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by MsStacy (1035) 12 years ago

Some of the people in this movement amaze me! You protest a variety of different things, have no clear agenda, and don't want to recruit your own candidates and elect them to congress. Then you seem surprised that politicians, who live and die only for votes, don't take you seriously.

So since no one has decided to change the country because of a few protest marches and no one in the movement seems to want to use the system, you decide you want to turn the crazy dial up to 11, all the way up to armed rebellion?

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

I support Ron Lawl because he's consistent and I know he has a good intention for our rights. Rights are more important than safety or money. He is a champion of the constitution, but I do see your point make. I also should edit my post, because I should put armed rebellion as a last ditch effort. But for you, MAKE A SUGGESTION THEN!

[-] 2 points by MsStacy (1035) 12 years ago

A presidential candidate doesn't concern me. One man in the White House is easily held in check by congress. Occupy is national and what I've seen proposed is getting the general assemblies to recruit candidates for congress. Run these people in primaries whit an agenda of finance reform, and fighting corporate corruption. Make Occupy a political force listened to by congress, like so many other groups.

[-] 2 points by RedJazz43 (2757) 12 years ago

It is absolutely essential that the movement remain nonviolent in order to win over as much public support as possible, The onus of violence needs to remain with the police for the growth of the movement,

[-] 2 points by mum52 (2) 12 years ago

Re: armed occupiers- I don't know how others on here feel, but the fact that you would even come on here talking about buying arms really bothers me. I have been following and contributing to the movement since the very beginning and have never heard anyone seriously push this. This to me is one dangerous aspect of having a completely open and uncensored (or barely censored) forum. And there are so many interesting and intelligent discussions, but there is a ton of bull to wade through to get to them. I just want to say I find this really offensive.

[-] 2 points by thenewgreen (170) 12 years ago

The only thing (other than violence and NONE of us wants that) that power will listen to is MONEY. This is what we should ALL do:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I59O5oZLlyg

january 3rd. MOVE YOUR MONEY! Spread the word.

[-] 2 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

Those who staunchly advocate violence,

and who will not be tamed by either reason,

love of their own neighbor,

or caution on behalf of the Movement,

must be ostracized and disavowed.

.

z

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

Ron Lawl has said he supports half of Occupy, he can barely be considered a supporter.

[-] 0 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

There are plenty here I don't support, yanno, the crazy ones who want communism, socialism, direct and 1:1 democracy, equal wages and silly nonsense like that whose unrealistic wants and ideals make them counter-productive to the entire cause amongst reasonable persons that are within or looking.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

Let's have OWS debates with various "experts".

[-] 1 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

what things should we debate in?

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

How the elites push corrupt economic theory.

[-] -1 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Well, everyone here agrees with that so it's no debate. But I do agree, there are many things that need to get solved or the movement may divide.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

What I meant, which was not clear, was host a debate with opposing experts.

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Oh yes, we should. However, it would be impossible on fox news for the host would dismiss our points or denounce our cause as a "bum's protest" to their tv audience.

[-] 0 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

Well, throw in some trap doors and slime, make it a reality/game show?

[-] 0 points by CobyART5 (59) 12 years ago

Article 5 Convention NOW!

The only real solution to keep government in the hands of the people and never letting the government get this out of control again is Article 5.

An Article 5 Convention with the "Greater Meaning of Free Speech" (GMFS) is the best way to ensure that the people are always in charge of their own lives, that the size of federal and state government stays proportionate to the population, and the GMFS will ensure that there can never again be the broad interpretation that purposely allowed for the loopholes of language that politicians have used against us for their own gain of power. An Article 5 Convention is our only hope of taking back our freedom and ensuring transparency of government.

http://articlevconvention.org/showthread.php?10-Templates-Letter-to-State-Representatives-request-for-house-resolution Article 5 is our first and last constitutional right. If we don't use it now, we will not have any rights. Freedom is not free. Unity is cheap compared to the demise of the nwo default with confused sheep, not free.

Educate yourselves about article V.

Lessig power point on article V http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gpbfY-atMk

Lots of facts here about Article V. Lawsuit filed against all members of congress, video. http://algoxy.com/poly/article_v_convention.html

Article V conference, Lawrence Lessig at harvard 9/25/11-other attendee video comments http://vimeo.com/31464745 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-7ikbvu0Y8

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Idea #4: We need an official discussion on dealing with matters, secure from agents/trolls/or anti-OWS. We need a secure website on how to move this forward, with little discussion about things unimportant to matters.

[-] 3 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

If you are interested in armed insurrection, you need to form your own group.

Occupy Wall Street does not, and can not, endorse violence.

[-] -1 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

The reason I'm suggesting this in OWS, is because it has the potential for change, while Unions(Similar protesting) are effective sometimes, many times they are put down or dissolve. We have our rights being taken away and with the OWS being popular, it should not be the platform for JUST economic fairness, but change within our government and how it handles things such as military, economy, domestic, and foreign policies.

As for the armed insurrection, face it, our demands may not come. if they do, great! If not, we will have little choice but to rise the same way the protesters in the Arab Spring.

[-] 0 points by littlebilly (12) 12 years ago

This is the best place to start- then here http://1vbd3.cjb.net

of course this use to be a free country- anything you want is fine.

Strategizing For A Living Revolution By George Lakey

world revolution began , in Sebia, then serbian arabs used the arabic version of gene sharps book from dictatorship to democracy to orcrestrate the arab spring, then it migrated to ows , usa thru cairo - then the world.-


http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/lakeylivrev.html

mp3 33 minutes

http://www.multiupload.com/V0GECSMHFI

Excerpt: Cynical outsiders were skeptical when Otpur activists claimed not to have a leader, when the young people said they were all leaders and shared responsibility for their actions and their common discipline. What the skeptics overlooked was the power of strategy as a unifying force, taking its place beside the rebel energy and the lessons of recent history that the young people shared. Otpur activists didn't need an underground commander giving them their marching orders because they shared a strategy they believed in; they were happy to improvise creatively within that strategic framework.

[-] 2 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

Otpor was funded by repelicans

  • Freedom House (Mowat, op. cit.)
  • International Republican Institute (IRI) (Mowat, op. cit.)
  • National Endowment for Democracy
  • Open Society Institute USAID – Financed T-shirts, stickers, etc United States Institute of Peace (Dobbs, op. cit.)

SourceWatch - Otpor

see also:

Wiki on Otpor

see also:

[-] -1 points by littlebilly (12) 12 years ago

Yes they were funded from within the usa- and now they are helping the us people in their fight against an oppressive government- which supports the rich at the expense of the poor. http://tinyurl.com/6lkzgbk

[-] 3 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

fucking repelicans are the one percent you moron.

If I say - new market opportunities

does that ring any bells?

[-] -1 points by littlebilly (12) 12 years ago

yes Pelicans fuck just like any other large bird.

Nonviolent Transformation of Conflict

Teaching Model:

english pdf 140 pages

http://www.upeace.org/library/documents/nvtc_Teaching_Model.pdf


Preface

Teaching Model: Nonviolent Transformation of Conflict is the first publication in a series that furthers the commitment of the University for Peace (UPEACE) in sharing knowledge for achieving peace world-wide. It represents the collective effort of scholars, academicians, and professionals of peace and conflict studies to make widely available cutting-edge, user-friendly curricula on peace-related subjects. UPEACE resident and affiliate faculty members spearhead the creation of such teaching models in collaboration with their colleagues world-wide during curriculum development workshops. These gatherings provide a forum for sharing knowledge and experience on various subjects and for designing comprehensive curricula adaptable across cultures. http://tinyurl.com/7rvpv43

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Idea #3: Everyone use the internet to their advantage. It's been said a million times, but with not as much luck as i hoped. Post statuses on facebook, twitter, myspace, or anything else.

Also Go to local shops (if you know the owners, even better) ask if you can post a flyer about the movement. Go on radio shows and advertise the movement. Create songs about it. TELL EVERYONE!

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Idea #2: Created Universal rules/demands/and other documents that will organize our protest into a true movement more people can understand. We need something that can authenticate our movement.

[-] 0 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Idea #1: Buy guns. exercise your second amendment. Don't go shooting, just be prepared.

[-] 1 points by littlebilly (12) 12 years ago

buy guns from a private party, get a receipt. don't let them know who you are. do not join the American riflemen association. - that's the first place the government will go--to get a list of gun owners.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

What about NRA?

[-] 0 points by littlebilly (12) 12 years ago

yes them to --

Nonviolent Transformation of Conflict

Teaching Model:

english pdf 140 pages

http://www.upeace.org/library/documents/nvtc_Teaching_Model.pdf


Preface

Teaching Model: Nonviolent Transformation of Conflict is the first publication in a series that furthers the commitment of the University for Peace (UPEACE) in sharing knowledge for achieving peace world-wide. It represents the collective effort of scholars, academicians, and professionals of peace and conflict studies to make widely available cutting-edge, user-friendly curricula on peace-related subjects. UPEACE resident and affiliate faculty members spearhead the creation of such teaching models in collaboration with their colleagues world-wide during curriculum development workshops. These gatherings provide a forum for sharing knowledge and experience on various subjects and for designing comprehensive curricula adaptable across cultures http://simurl.com/mavtad

[-] 1 points by TaylorBenitez (10) 12 years ago

Thank you for the advice.