Posted 6 months ago on Oct. 26, 2012, 7:32 a.m. EST by ThomasJefferson
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Obama would get in a second management the same economic failure that obtained in the first, while Republicans are willing to stabilize the economy, even if only temporarily, by military enterprises, as did Bush invading to Iraq. For this reason they will be instinctively favored by voters.
Conscious civil society should present with a revolutionary attitude, without falling into bureaucratic paradigms as that "a draft amendment needs at least a year be approved", claiming to start a real improvement of the economy from the government spending, which outgoing Congress approve in an amendment like the following before November 6:
-Elected rulers and public officials are obliged to consensus their decisions and management of public resources with civil society through the free participation of voluntary, independent, autonomous and honorary citizens. So that actions and management of public funds of rulers and officials are subject to legal process (dismissal and criminal prosecution) if they fail to abide by any agreement or in consultation with civil society. -Each officer or ruler may convene meetings of discussion and decision of agreements, or let a Consensus Act in his Office or web site, where each person who wants to participate will vote in favor or against the government plan and budget, subscribing with his name and any identifying information. So that everyone can be convinced that every action and spending that is running the Government had at least the support of 50% + 1 of the people affected. - In the case of governmental plans rejected by civil society, this will have to organize sessions to analyze and discuss, in person or via technology, and formulate alternative proposals through Agreed Minutes sent to officials and rulers, to consider these in the redesign that they will have to make of their plans.
This type of legislation would free the country's political development. Starting with the social movements of protest would render to become propositional, leaving the marches and sit-ins as main resources, to use social networks, virtual and physical, in the debate and decision of agreements that will allow civil society, from its monitoring and review of government action, become in its most valuable partner and finally legitimating and defender of its administration. Implying a social, economic and cultural development based on widespread community work.
It must immediately appoint a list of socially recognizable personalities, as non-registered candidates for different elected positions, willing to pass an amendment like this among their first acts of Government. For in case that none of the political parties try to even formulate the legislative proposal at the Congress, aware civil society agreed to vote for the list.
Because if in an effort to get more votes a political party dares to make such legislative proposal, the other would have to support it pretending to win the election, and it would accelerate to pass the amendment.
Voting for unregistered candidates probably could not avoid Romney's victory, but could set the direction of what civil society must make in electoral processes to no longer be fooled by the farce of the supposed opposition of political parties, which rather is a collaboration to legitimize each other and keep the parasitic class at expense of exploitation and slaughter of people.