Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: I do hope that OWS is aware

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 8, 2011, 3:22 p.m. EST by Rob (881)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

that if the desire is to overthrow the government and replace the Constitution that is tantamount to treason. If you plan on splintering off that will instigate a civil war. Either way you lose and you will die.

35 Comments

35 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by moediggity (646) from Houston, TX 12 years ago

No not really.

[-] 1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 12 years ago

How about just a massive reform?

[-] 1 points by CanEd (78) from Edmonton, AB 12 years ago

I do hope that you're aware that the government has been subverted to the whims of multinational corporations and taken from the people, which is tantamount to a coup, or high treason.

I do hope you're aware that that very government disregards that very Constitution you hold sacred, which is tantamount to treason. The government as outlined in the constitution has already been overthrown, not violently but from an inner rot. It is you duty as an American to oppose this.

The only thing required for evil men to succeed is that good men do nothing.

[-] 1 points by JoeSteel (58) 12 years ago

Not everybody supporting OWS wants to trash the Consittution. Where did you even come upmwith this idea?

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

1% vs 99% ?

Who will lose a hypothetical civil war?

If I was you I would respect the principle of non-violence.

[-] 1 points by BrainC (400) from Austin, TX 12 years ago

Who has control of the national guard and police offiers? The government will win the war.

[-] 2 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

1) The US government cannot win a protracted guerrilla war against goat herders living in the mountains of Afghanistan--- let alone against the logistical nightmare of doing this on their own soil against their own population. Governments cannot defeat their own population united against them--- its nonsense.

2) Many former/current military personnel (like myself) will refuse orders to turn their weapons on US citizens. http://www.mikenew.com/29palms.html

[-] 1 points by BrainC (400) from Austin, TX 12 years ago

it all depends on how it is portrayed in the media. It will not be displayed as a civil war, it will be a rebellion and a riot. Look at Oakland. How is that portrayed? OWS started a riot. All the gov't has to do is call in the riot police, and fan the flames. Sooner or later, a riot will start that needs to be squashed with force.

Your missing "the population united against them" part of your conclusion above.

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Your missing the collapse of the corporate/state media and their ability to control the flow of information.

The internet has defeated the propaganda system. Nobody is buying your shit anymore.

[-] 1 points by BrainC (400) from Austin, TX 12 years ago

why is it MY shit? Im not selling any shit. Would you care to buy my shit?

well, since all of it is hypothetical anyway... then we will all descend into anarchy and it is no longer the gov't against OWS. It will be the haves against the have nots, and the haves with guns will win.

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Have against the have-nots is what we have now. Anarchy is the absence of coercion/hierarchy. Perhaps you mean "Anomie"?

Regardless, your assumption rests the idea that functioning civil society is impossible without the US government and its corporate rulers.

Nothing supports this idea. In fact, economic organization and social cohesion/harmony would be greatly improved by the abolition of these parasitic/repressive institutions.

[-] 1 points by SMHFutureOfHumanity (22) 12 years ago

The problem with the "99%" is that it does not have the support of the 99% OWS is a group of marginal protesters and lobbyists.

Unless one's individual income is over 500,000 (annually) they are not part of the 1%.

Chances are, people with incomes of 70K-500K are not supporting OWS movement, (if it can even be called a movement)

[-] 2 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Its a documented fact that the majority of both the US population and the world support OWS. If it comes down to open class war the other side will lose. Lets try and keep things Civil. Its in your own best interests.

[-] 0 points by gr57 (457) 12 years ago

where is this documentation?

[-] 2 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Um, in poll after poll. Do you not read newspapers? only foxnews? I'm done doing basic research for people. Google is your friend.

This just in: Earth round. "nah man! i want to see proof!"

[-] 0 points by gr57 (457) 12 years ago

do you have any of these polls? from un-biased sources?

[-] 2 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Dozens of hits on Google from many commonly cited polling agencies. go for it.

If this where some obscure factoid i was citing i could see you demanding links/documents. This is widely reported in many media outlets. Its like if you were demanding I give you citations that Mitt Romney is running for president. I am not responsible for your ignorance.

[-] 0 points by gr57 (457) 12 years ago

Well that's the thing. I did look. and it looks like 30% of America supports you, 30% don't give a dam and 40% are opposed to you

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

As opposed to more than 50% (A majority) like most polls from credible agencies are showing...

[-] 0 points by gr57 (457) 12 years ago

I did find that 50% support either the Tea Party and OWS but not seperatly

[-] 0 points by gr57 (457) 12 years ago

It was the associated press and the examiner.

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

SIGH

"Some 59 percent of adults either completely agree or mostly agree with the protesters, while 31 percent mostly disagree or completely disagree; 10 percent of those surveyed didn't know or refused to answer.

What's more, many people are paying attention to the rallies. Almost two-thirds of respondents--65 percent--said they've heard "a lot" or "some" about the rallies, while 35 percent have said they've heard or seen "not too much" or "nothing at all" about the demonstrations.

The results appear in the latest edition of the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll. "

You'll note that polls overrepresented by registered voters (either republican or democrat) show distorted statistics compared to other polls. The majority of Americans don't waste their time voting---because its meaningless.

[-] 0 points by karenpoore (902) 12 years ago

The reason the 99% are not all supporting OWS yet is because they are still living in la la land and have not woke up. Don't worry the worse is yet to come ... all OWS is trying to do is enlighten the people living in la la land. www.activistpost.com/2010/08/10-signs-us-is-becoming-third-world.html

www.activistpost.com/2011/11/world-war-3-foregone-conclusion-video.html Read Zen Gardner's link article under video here

[Removed]

[-] -2 points by Rob (881) 12 years ago

You assume far too much, OWS is less than 1% of the population and the vast majority of the population could care less about your social club.

[-] 1 points by packetStorm (128) 12 years ago

I hope the GA will get around to using ... Article Five of the United States Constitution.

[-] 1 points by OLLAG (84) 12 years ago

That is true. the OWS is not a threat though they are a tiny percent of the overall population. and they think they are great but their is rape and thievery everyday their!

[-] 0 points by hillary (252) 12 years ago

This is why i'm very concerned about this Leaderless-Collective™ and the possibility that the weak "consensus" method will get overridden with an Anarchist movement and bring their treasonous plan to fruition and therefore lead all the members of Occupy to a slaughter.

[-] 0 points by Idaltu (662) 12 years ago

A civil war? WTF are you talking about?

[-] 0 points by Rob (881) 12 years ago

If the desire is to splinter off via the "convention" planned for Philadelphia next year, then it becomes a declaration of war.

[-] 0 points by Idaltu (662) 12 years ago

Why would a convention of OWS be a declaration of war? And who is the war against?

[-] 1 points by Rob (881) 12 years ago

Like the Declaration of Independence was a letter to the King that "we are not going to take it anymore", depending on the wording of any declaration from the convention, it COULD be construed as an act to remove the current government, thus a declaration of war.

[-] 1 points by EricBlair (447) 12 years ago

Most of the population doesn't support the US government. It does not rule by the consent of the government--- as such it is illegitimate and illegal.

[-] 0 points by karenpoore (902) 12 years ago

How about firing the current population in the White House for not doing their jobs. Do not pass go, do not collect $200 and go straight to jail!

[-] -1 points by sdcheung (76) 12 years ago

Fuck this shit Zionist occupied country... A Civil war it is.

we're run from tel Aviv anyway,