Forum Post: Drug Money: If you don't get this, you don't have a clue.
Posted 12 years ago on Jan. 14, 2012, 12:07 p.m. EST by valfather
(286)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Wachovia apparently funneled enormous amounts of drug money form Mexico. Cenk Uygur breaks it down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H4is0OGmSU
The EyeOpener- Morbid Addiction: CIA & the Drug Trade
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/10/14/the-eyeopener-morbid-addiction-cia-the-drug-trade/
"In late 2009, Antonio Maria Costa, the head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, even went on record to say that it was primarily drug money that kept the American financial system afloat during the 2008 crisis, estimating that some $352 billion dollars of drug profits had been laundered via the major US banks during that time."
OWS will fail if you don't get this. I know it's probably so far off your radar as to seem either inconsequential or even unbelievable.
http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/narcoDollars.html
Narco-Dollars for Beginners "How the Money Works" in the Illicit Drug Trade by Catherine Austin Fitts Special to the Narco News Bulletin 2001
Ah, ratical.org -- that name takes me back to the early net before blogs and forums.
Nothing new in this stuff. At least not to those who've been paying attention. I just noticed that these posts are getting voted down. Strange.
Strange indeed. I love what you're doing. I wish I had the time to do what you're doing, but unfortunately my life isn't such at the moment. The link below is a respected website I thought you might get some use from.
http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/deepblacklies_new.htm
Catherine Austin Fitts is one of the people has been getting it for decades. Go 19 minutes into this and listen for a few minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5kEYF1FcEU&feature=related
I just checked out those sites. They are really awakening. Thanks
Don't be surprised if this gets ignored. It seems there are more people that want to suppress things like this than there are to allow them to be exposed.
They will call it conspiracy theory, no matter how well documented.
Take the profits out of the illegal drug trade -- legalize it. Decriminalize marijuana, make weak cocaine legal, etc.
In a jobs economy (i.e., a small business economy) people would have a future to look forward to. Young people striding confidently forward into a future with anticipation will not abuse drugs.
There are small towns that would be completely dead economically without the drug trade. It's worse than you think.
Catherine Austin Fitts claims that an abrupt termination of the illicit drug trade would destroy the economy. I don't doubt it. But the illicit drug trade is harmful in other ways. It compromises people, undermines trust and confidence, facilitates blackmail and bribery. It is a general corrosive eating away at society.
On the other hand, I look at the British Opium Wars against China, and we see that legal drugs can also be harmful to a population. I don't have easy answers. The one thing I do see is that ignoring the problem will only make it worse.
If you get your story straight with 9-11, you will be doing well to defend the constitution. Actual facts and evidence here.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
The drug business for covert operations, or filling the debt they created throught the black budget, is an absolute certainty that goes back to 1984 with ollie north lying to congress.
Michael Ruppert as an LAPD officer caught the CIA selling cocaine in Compton to gangsters. He mentions it in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUKeZLeGTDk&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PL13AA7ADC3EB2E934
http://www.ae911truth.org/ 1,655 architects and engineers who do not accept the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center don't agree with you. No one else agrees with you. You have nothing but some claim that some anonymous person told you something. Some of that 1,655 actually worked in the WTC. I will take their word over yours.
Article 5 convention NOW!
Show their evidence, . . . or any independently verified evidence at all. They never have.
This site is all about it,
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
including facts about gage.
http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11disinfo_gage.html
His web site and wtc7.net are maintained by Gregg Hoffman that worked in the drone industry. http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/strange-bedfellows-ae911truth-the-drone-industry-and-dwain-deets/
The nwo doesn't agree with me either.
Social information, not technical structural information, is what you are working with. I am a virtual witness to the construction of WTC 1 in fast motion through a detailed documentary titled, "The Engineeringh and Construction of the Twin Towers." It was 2 hours in length over 2 evening on PBS here in southern california. About 70% was about the concrete core construction and the difficulties found in construction the first concrete core tower on that scale, or even near it.
Oxford Encyclopedia of Innovation and Technology.
"Steel and concrete hull and core structures."
http://algoxy.com/conc/images/oxfordarchcore.jpg
The PDF clearly says;
By: August Domel , Jr., Ph.D., SE.,P.E November 2001
WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AT GROUND ZERO Prepared for: National Council of Structural Engineers Associations - Structural Engineering Emergency Response Plan (SEERP) Committee By: August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001
CHAPTER 2: GROUND ZERO OPERATIONS AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER 2.1 General Groundbreaking for construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966. Tower One, standing 1368 feet high, was completed in 1970, and Tower Two, at 1362 feet high, was completed in 1972. The structural design for the World Trade Center Towers was done by Skilling, Helle, Christiansen and Robertson. It was designed as a tube building that included a perimeter moment-resisting frame consisting of steel columns spaced on 39-inch centers. The load carrying system was designed so that the steel facade would resist lateral and gravity forces and the interior concrete core would carry only gravity loads.
Dr. Domel received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988 and a Law Degree from Loyola University in 1992. He is a licensed Structural Engineer and Attorney at Law in the State of Illinois and a Professional Engineer in twelve states, including the State of New York. Dr. Domel is authorized by the Department of Labor (OSHA) as a 10 and 30 hour construction safety trainer.
Read the .pdf yourself.
http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf
You are the one that has been erroneously informed by a false or misinformed truth movement. To prove it, you cannot show the Tower could stand as as steel core columned structure, or be demolished.
The information here, will explain to you in feasible detail, what happened, and how it was done.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
Wh-o-a-a-a-a!!!! You did it again valfather. You should be writing your own web news site. You're doing important work. But not until OWS has done its job....we need you here for a while.
[Removed]
[Removed]